Blebbistatin

Targeting Myosin by Blebbistatin Derivatives: Optimization and Pharmacological Potential

Anna Á. Rauscher,1 Máté Gyimesi,1 Mihály Kovács,1,* and András Málnási-Csizmadia1,*

Blebbistatin is a widely used inhibitor of myosin 2 that enables the study of a broad range of cytoskeleton-related processes. However, blebbistatin has several limitations hindering its applicability: it is fluorescent, poorly water soluble, cytotoxic, and prone to (photo)degradation. Despite these adverse effects, being the only available myosin 2-specifi c inhibitor, blebbistatin is rather a choice of necessity. Blebbistatin has been modifi ed to improve its properties and some of the new compounds have proven to be useful replace- ments of the original molecule. This review summarizes recent results on blebbistatin development. We also discuss the pharmacological perspectives of these efforts, as myosins are becoming promising drug target candidates for a variety of conditions ranging from neurodegeneration to muscle disease, wound healing, and cancer metastasis.

Blebbistatin: A Molecular Scaffold with a Promising Future
Myosin 2 isoforms (see Glossary) play essential roles in vital processes ranging from cell division through cell motility and neuronal plasticity to contractile functions of skeletal, cardiac, and smooth muscles (Box 1) [1]. Thus, the development of myosin 2 isoform-specific lead compounds is of great potential in the treatment of various myosin- and cytoskeleton-related diseases (Table 1). To date, four allosteric inhibitory binding sites have been determined in myosin 2 (Figure 1A) including those of blebbistatin [2,3], pseudilins [4], the cardiac myosin- specific omecamtiv mecarbil [5], and the smooth muscle-specifi c CK-571 [6]. Based on structural considerations, the blebbistatin-binding site appears to be versatile and confers great potential for myosin 2 isoform-specifi c drug development (Figure 1B). This review focuses on blebbistatin and its recently developed derivatives.

Since its discovery and mechanistic characterization, the myosin 2 inhibitor blebbistatin has proven highly useful in a broad range of research areas including neuroscience, skeletal, cardiac and smooth muscle physiology, cell migration, cytokinesis, differentiation, mechanobi- ology, and cancer research (with over 600 PubMed citation this to date). Blebbistatin has become a standard research tool for assessing the role of tension generation and other cytoskeletal activities in practically any biological process. However, the application of blebbistatin requires extra care as the compound has several nonspecific adverse effects including cytotoxicity, phototoxicity, high fluorescence, structural instability (detailed later), which may mask possible myosin-specific effects. To overcome these hurdles, several blebbistatin derivatives have been developed [7–14]. Some of these derivatives have already been applied successfully for research purposes (e.g., in cases where a myosin 2 inhibitor with low fl uorescence and high photostability was required for fluorescence imaging [15–17]). In addition to research applications, myosin 2 inhibitors based on the blebbistatin scaffold bear great potential as lead compounds for treating various myosin 2-related diseases (see below).
Highlights
Blebbistatin is a myosin 2 inhibitor widely used in biochemical, cell biolo- gical, and physiological experiments investigating the roles of myosin 2 iso- forms in various biological processes.

Despite its high potential in affecting myosin 2-related processes, blebbis- tatin has adverse features hindering its effective application in biological systems.

A variety of myosin 2-related human diseases could be targeted by a bio- logically safe blebbistatin derivative.

Modifications of blebbistatin’s A-ring significantly reduced its inhibitory properties, suggesting that this part of the molecule is not optimal for further development.

D-ring substitutions with small, hydro- philic side chains retained the potent inhibitory properties of blebbistatin, while signifi cantly reducing its adverse features and improving its biosafety.

Further assays on various myosin 2 isoforms with newly developed bleb- bistatin derivatives will be of high potential toward myosin 2 isoform- selective drug development.

1Motor Pharmacology Research Group, Department of Biochemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary

*Correspondence: mihaly.kovacs@ttk.elte.hu (M. Kovács) and
malna@elte.hu (A. Málnási-Csizmadia).

Trends in Biochemical Sciences, Month Year, Vol. xx, No. yy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2018.06.006 1 © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Box 1. Overview of Actomyosin Structure and Blebbistatin Action
Myosins are a superfamily of eukaryotic cytoskeletal motor proteins that produce directed movement along actin filaments, powered by the free enthalpy liberated during the ATP hydrolytic cycle. The heavy-chain subunit of myosin possesses a motor (catalytic) domain containing the binding sites for actin and ATP; a neck region that acts as a force- transmitting lever binds the light chain(s) and is also a key site for regulation; and a tail region with effector functions (Figure I). Myosin-driven force production and movement are achieved via allosteric coupling between myosin’s ATPase active site, the actomyosin interaction, and the force-transmitting lever during the mechanochemical cycle.

Heavy chains of Class 2 myosins dimerize through coiled-coil formation between tail regions, and dimers assemble into myosin 2 filaments, with size and dynamics showing great variation between isoforms [1]. Skeletal and cardiac muscle myosin 2 molecules, driving the contractility of voluntary and heart muscles, respectively, form stable thick fi laments in muscle sarcomeres. By contrast, non-sarcomeric SMM2 and NM2 isoforms undergo reversible depolymerization regulating their activity. Mammals possess three NM2 isoforms termed NM2A, NM2B, and NM2C, with partially overlapping tissue distribution. NM2 isoforms are expressed in practically all cell types (even in muscle cells) and perform vital roles in cytokinesis, cell migration, adhesion, mechanosensing, membrane traffi cking, as well as tissue and cellular morphogenesis including the outgrowth and retraction of neurites [30]. Myosin 2 isoforms show great variability in their kinetic properties, precisely tuned for their highly diverse mechanochemical functions ranging from rapid contraction of muscles to sustained tension maintenance that determines the mechanical features of tissues and organs [31].

Blebbistatin inhibits the mechanochemical cycle of myosin 2 via binding to an allosteric site in the motor domain, located between the actin and ATP-binding regions (Figure I) [2]. The inhibitor stabilizes an actin-detached state of myosin 2, and prevents the enzyme from entering force generation [20,21]. Blebbistatin inhibits nearly all myosin 2 isoforms [22,23], except for Drosophila and Acanthamoeba NM2s, with this broad-effect spectrum limiting the pharmacological applicability of the molecule. The development of blebbistatin toward isoform-selective inhibitors, as well as those with improved stability, solubility, and reduced cytotoxicity, is therefore of primary importance in its prospective clinical utilization.

Glossary
Actin: a globular protein that forms dynamic polymer fi laments. These filaments form part of the cytoskeleton and, besides binding and organizing a variety of protein complexes, serve as molecular tracks for all myosin isoforms performing a wide variety of contractile and transport functions.
ATP: a molecule hydrolyzed by many enzymes, including motor proteins, with the liberated free energy being used for metabolic processes and mechanical work.
Blebbistatin: a myosin 2-specific inhibitor that blocks the ATPase cycle of myosin 2 in an actin- detached state.
Chiral: a structure that is not superimposable by its mirror image. The activities of chiral variants (enantiomers) of a molecule may markedly differ. Blebbistatin contains a chiral carbon atom with a hydroxyl ligand, with only one enantiomer being a potent myosin 2 inhibitor. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO): a widely used colorless organic solvent

Tail

ATP
Myosin 2 motor domain structure
that is used to dissolve substances with limited water solubility, such as

ADP +Pi
Motor- domain

Neck
+ light chains

T

Recovery

ADP.Pi analog
blebbistatin and its derivatives. In biological experiments, DMSO concentration is generally kept below 1% to reduce solvent artifacts.
IC50 (half maximal inhibitory

DP
Myosin
T

Actin-
concentration) values: inhibitory constant that defi nes the inhibitor

Actin
power- stroke

ATP
hydrolysis
binding cleti

Blebbistatin
concentration at half-maximal effect. The IC50 value is indicative of, but not equivalent to, the binding affinity of the inhibitor for the enzyme.

DP
DP
Root of neck
Inhibitor: a molecule that reversibly or irreversibly reduces the rate of an enzymatic reaction.

DP DP Mechanochemical cycle: the

Blebbistatin

Figure I. Scheme of the Actomyosin Working Cycle (Left), and Location of the Blebbistatin-Binding Site within the Myosin Motor Domain (Right, Based on PDB Structure 1YV3). Abbreviations: T, ATP; D, ADP; P, inorganic phosphate (Pi).

Structural and Kinetic Mechanism of Blebbistatin Action
Blebbistatin was identifi ed in 2003 as a myosin 2 inhibitor that blocks the constriction of the cleavage furrow during cytokinesis, without disruption of mitosis or contractile ring assembly [18]. Subsequent molecular mechanistic studies revealed how blebbistatin exerts its effects via interfering with the myosin 2 mechanochemical cycle (see Box 1 for an overview of myosin 2 structure and function and the myosin–blebbistatin interaction).
complete sequence of enzymatic substeps of motor proteins, during which the chemical energy liberated from ATP hydrolysis is transduced into mechanical work.
Myosin: a superfamily of motor proteins found in eukaryotes. Myosins convert the energy stored in ATP into mechanical energy, in the
form of translocating along their actin filament track. This movement results in processes including muscle contraction, organelle transport, cell movement, and neurite outgrowth.

Table 1. Medical Indications for Myosin 2 Inhibition
Target isoform Medical indication Blebbistatin effect Refs
Non-muscle myosin 2A Proplatelet formation [70]
Cancer chemotherapy Cancer metastasis Reduced cancer cell motility Prospective
Leukemia cell migration Reduced central nervous system infi ltration of leukemia cells [51]
Hemostasis and thrombosis Clot retraction Reduced platelet forces [71]
Arterial thrombosis Mice: induced arterial thrombosis was ameliorated [53,72]
Nerve injury Neuronal apoptosis [73]
Non-muscle myosin 2B Drug prevention Prevention of relapse in methamphetamine use Reduced context-induced drug seeking [39]
Non-muscle myosin 2C
NM2 (isoform not specified) Peripheral neuropathy Prospective
Tumor chemotherapy Hepatocarcinoma Human hepatocellular carcinoma cells: antitumorigenic [48]
Lung carcinoma Lung (carcinoma) cells: suppressed migration [49]
Benign prostatic hyperplasia [50]
Length-dependent neuropathy Prospective
Fibrosis Lung fibrosis Human lung fibroblasts: morphology and migration affected [42]
Liver fi brosis Hepatic stellate cells: morphology and function affected [43]
Arthrofi brosis Joint capsule fibroblasts: force generation and collagen production affected [44]
Inhibited secretion of CypA in atherosclerotic lesions [74]
Dermal wound healing (Keloid) human dermal
fi broblasts: migration and pathogenesis affected, reduced collagen remodeling [45–47]
Drug prevention Substance (drug) use disorder Formation and maintenance of long-term memory affected [39–41]
Nerve injury Spinal cord injury Upregulation of myosin light- chain phosphorylation in axons around the lesion site [38]
Periodontitis Pathological apoptosis Reduced receptor-mediated signaling [75]
Immune-related diseases Multiple sclerosis Reduced substrate stiffness of the endothelium [76]
Antiviral Herpes virus Limited virion entry and egress [77]

Table 1. (continued)
Target isoform Medical indication Blebbistatin effect Refs
Smooth muscle myosin 2A (tonic, vascular) Vasodilatation High blood pressure [52]
Pulmonary (arterial) hypertension Fasudil (ROCK inhibitor): reduced pulmonary arterial pressure [56]
Erectile dysfunctions Relaxation of corpus cavernosum smooth muscle [54]
Thrombotic disorders Inhibited thrombus formation [53]
Smooth muscle myosin 2B (phasic, intestinal) Overactive bladder [78]
Bladder compliance [55]
Bladder outlet obstruction [50]
Erectile dysfunction Relaxation of corpus cavernosum smooth muscle [54]
Cardiac myosin 2b (ventricular) Cardiomyopathies Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Reduced contractility [26]
Dilated cardiomyopathy [79]
Skeletal muscle myosin 2 Spasms Nonspecifi c low back pain [63]
Spinal disk hernia, lumbago [64]
Stress-related occipital spasm Prospective
Epilepsia partialis continua [66,67]
Multiple sclerosis (spasticity) [65]
Genital dysfunctions (vaginism) [68]
Obstetrical muscle relaxation Prospective
Spasm-causing medications Prospective
Skeletal and cardiac myopathies Altered ability of myofi laments to generate force Reduced ATPase activity and reduced contractility [60]

During the actomyosin working cycle, the binding of ATP to the motor domain of myosin exerts an allosteric effect leading to actomyosin dissociation. ATP is subsequently hydrolyzed in the active site of the actin-detached motor domain, leading to an enzyme–products complex with bound ADP and inorganic phosphate (Pi). In the uninhibited working cycle, the myosin motor domain rebinds to actin in this posthydrolytic state. During this process, the strengthening of the actomyosin interaction is coupled to a swing of myosin’s force-transducing lever, leading to force generation and translocation of myosin’s distal part (and the myosin 2 fi lament) relative to the actin filament (see Figure I in Box 1) [19]. Blebbistatin was shown to stabilize the myosin– ADP–Pi complex, thereby inhibiting the formation of strong actomyosin interactions and the entry into force-producing states (see Figure I in Box 1) [20,21]. Importantly, this effect blocks myosin in an actin-detached state, preventing artifacts that could arise from rigidifi ed actomy- osin linkages. This feature makes blebbistatin a highly useful, mildly invasive research tool in a broad range of cell biological and muscle physiological studies.

X-ray crystallographic studies revealed that blebbistatin exerts its allosteric inhibitory effect via binding into a hydrophobic pocket located at the apex of a large cleft in the actin-binding region of the myosin motor domain, which is also in the vicinity of the g-phosphate-binding pocket of the ATPase active site (see Figure I in Box 1) [2]. Blebbistatin thus inhibits the closure of the actin-binding cleft, thereby preventing the formation of the strong actomyosin interaction.

(A)

Pseudilin (B)

NM2A RFG YLLE LDIAGFEIFDLNSFEQLCINYT VGQLYKEQLAKL
NM2B RFG YLLE LDIAGFEIFELNSFEQLCINYT VGQLYKESLTKL
NM2C RFG YLLE LDIAGFEIFQLNSFEQLCINYT VGQLYKESLSRL
Smooth RFG YLLE LDIAGFEIFEVNSFEQLCINYT VGQLYKEQLGKL
Cardiac RFG YLLE LDIAGFEIFDFNSFEQLCINFT VSALHRENLNKL
Skeletal RFG YLLE LDIAGFEIFDFNSLEQLCINFT VSALFRENLNKL
* * * ^

Omecamtiv mecarbil

Root of neck

Actin-binding cleti

A
B
C

D

Blebbistatin
CK-571

Figure 1. Myosin 2 Inhibitor Binding Sites. (A) Crystal structure of human non-muscle myosin 2C (NM2C) (PDB fi le 5I4E, portion comprising amino acids 1–799). Myosin inhibitor-binding sites (NM2C amino acid residues corresponding to those of target myosins within 4 Å of the bound inhibitor) are shown in space-fi ll representation. The blebbistatin-binding site shown (green) was obtained by placing the inhibitor into its crystallographically determined binding site (Dictyostelium myosin 2 structure, [2]) within a pre-relaxed NM2C crystal structure (based on PDB fi le 5I4E) and equilibrating for 20 ns [see also (B)]. The pseudilin-binding site (blue) was determined for Dictyostelium myosin 2 (PDB file 2XO8). Residues overlapping between blebbistatin- and pseudilin-binding sites are labeled in cyan. The omecamtiv mecarbil-binding site (red) was determined for human b-cardiac myosin 2 (PDB file 4PA0). This site largely overlaps (orange) with that of CK-571 (yellow) determined for chicken gizzard smooth muscle myosin (PDB file 5T45). (B) Alignment of blebbistatin contact residues [colored highlights, determined as in (A)] of six human myosin 2 isoforms. (The four sequence segments shown start at residues 234, 257, 451, and 646 in NM2A.) Residues conserved in all isoforms shown are highlighted in green, whereas yellow highlights indicate residues showing variation among isoforms. The structural image shows that the variable residues (yellow dots) that interact with the A- (labeled with ⌃ in the alignment) and D-rings (*) of blebbistatin provide opportunities for the development of isoform-specifi c inhibitors.

Blebbistatin is a chiral molecule, and myosin inhibition is specific to its S (–) enantiomer [18]. In the atomic structure of the myosin–blebbistatin complex, the hydroxyl moiety bonded to blebbistatin’s chiral carbon atom forms contacts to the backbone amide group of the G240 residue and the backbone carbonyl of L262 [amino acid numbering refers to Dictyos- telium discoideum myosin 2 (Ddm2) if not otherwise stated], and these interactions were implicated to be responsible for the striking enantioselectivity of the inhibitor [2].

Blebbistatin Sensitivity of Myosin Isoforms: Structural Basis and Enzyme Engineering Blebbistatin inhibits a large majority of Class 2 myosin isoforms, but it does not inhibit myosins from various other classes [22,23]. The published IC50 (half maximal inhibitory concentra- tion) values of blebbistatin reflect the highest affi nity for skeletal muscle myosin 2 (submi- cromolar IC50 values) and the lowest affinity for smooth muscle myosin 2 (SMM2; 3–80 mM), with intermediate values for cardiac and non-muscle myosin 2 (NM2) isoforms (1–10 mM; Figure 2) [8–12,22–28]. Blebbistatin’s specificity for myosin has been also confirmed by target fi shing based on photoaffi nity labeling: a photoreactive derivative of blebbistatin was photo- crosslinked to whole-cell lysates and the resulting conjugates were identified by mass spec- trometry [7]. In these experiments blebbistatin was photo-crosslinked to some non-myosin proteins, too, however, with at least 10 times lower affinity.

Structural and mechanistic studies provided clues for the structural basis of the inhibitor’s myosin isoform specificity and delineated routes of engineering blebbistatin sensitivity of myosin 2 iso- forms via amino acid substitutions [2,23,29]. The so-called switch-2 motif of myosin’s ATPase active site has the conserved amino acid sequence LDIXGFE, with the ‘X’ position showing class- specific variation (A or S in myosin 2; Y or F in many other myosin classes including blebbistatin-

100

10

1

0.1

Figure 2. Inhibitory Constants (IC50 Values) of Blebbistatin on Myosin 2 Isoforms. Blebbistatin is most potent on skeletal muscle myosin 2, while cardiac muscle, smooth muscle and non-muscle myosin 2 isoforms (including Dictyoste- lium myosin 2) are less effi ciently inhibited. Measurements were carried out using skeletal myosin isolated from rabbit fast skeletal muscles [8–12,22], cardiac myo- sin 2 isolated from pig heart left ventricle [22], cardiac papillary muscle from mouse [24], cardiac trabeculae from rat [25,26],

Skeletal muscle
Cardiac muscle
Smooth muscle
Non-
muscle
Dictyo- stelium
smooth muscle myosin 2 isolated from turkey [22], chicken gizzard or bovine stomach [27] and chicken gizzard or rab- bit uterine smooth muscle expressed in Sf9–insect cell–baculovirus system [23,28]; chicken, mouse or human non- muscle myosin 2 isoforms expressed in Sf9-baculovirus system [22,23], and Dic- tyostelium myosin 2 expressed in Dic- tyostelium expression system [8,9,22]. Abbreviation: IC50, half maximal inhibitory concentration.

insensitive myosins 1, 5, and 10) [1]. S456 of Ddm2, located at this position, is one of the key blebbistatin contact residues in myosin [2]. Accordingly, the introduction of an F residue in place of the native A at this position of SMM2 and NM2 isoforms (NM2A, NM2B, NM2C) rendered these myosins blebbistatin insensitive without compromising their mechanoenzymatic activity and regulation [23]. The introduction of other bulky residues (Y, W, R, or E; but not G) at this position of NM2A also markedly decreased its blebbistatin sensitivity [23].

The ‘I’ position in switch 2 (I455 in Ddm2; see also above) is conserved in almost all myosins, except for Drosophila melanogaster non-muscle myosin 2 (DmNM2) that has an M residue at this position (M466 in DmNM2). Intriguingly, this unique variation is associated with the blebbistatin insensitivity of wild-type DmNM2, which can be sensitized by an M-to-I substitution [29]. Conversely, an I-to-M substitution at the homologous position of human NM2A rendered this isoform blebbistatin insensitive [23].

Another residue implicated in the myosin–blebbistatin interaction, T474, is also conserved in many myosin 2 isoforms, but the homologous position is occupied by C or A in blebbistatin- insensitive myosins 1b, 5a, and 10 [2]. Intriguingly, however, the T474A-equivalent substitution in SMM2 did not abolish the blebbistatin sensitivity of this isoform [23]. Similarly, substitution of S266, a residue within the blebbistatin-binding pocket that is conserved in most myosins, to an L residue did not abolish the blebbistatin sensitivity of SMM2 [23]. It is noteworthy that Y634, forming strong hydrophobic contact with blebbistatin, is at a position occupied by residues with aromatic or aliphatic side chains in most myosins (Y, H, or F in myosin 2; F, I, or L in most other classes) [1,2]. In summary, the discussed studies revealed the utility of single amino acid substitution approaches in engineering the blebbistatin sensitivity of SMM2 and NM2 isoforms.

Physicochemical Properties of Blebbistatin Relevant for Research Planning
Solubility
A well-known issue related to blebbistatin treatment is the formation of precipitates, which may interfere with imaging, block circulation, result in uncontrolled conditions, and hinder the

(A)

100

(B)

3

Unstable Phototoxic
80

60
40
20
0
0

5

10
40
20
0
0 100 200 Time (min)
15

20
2

1

0

300

400

Stable

500

Non-phototoxic

600

(C)
[DMSO] (%)

(D)
Wavelength (nm)

80

60

40

20

Toxicity: 90–100% 30–90% 0–30% 0%

100

10

1

0.1

A-ring modification: D-ring modifications
in para- position:

8ʹ-nitro Amine
Nitro Allyloxy

00

50

100

150

200

0.01

Solubility

ND ND ND
Toxicity Fluorescence

[Blebbistatin] (μM)

Figure 3. Solubility and Phototoxicity of Blebbistatin, and Functional Improvements Achieved by Chemical Modifi cations. (A) Blebbistatin has low solubility in aqueous solutions including cell culture media, which signifi cantly limits its applicability. Increasing DMSO concentrations improve blebbistatin solubility but can also negatively influence cell viability above 1% DMSO. Results shown were obtained in different solvents containing 0.1–10% DMSO (solid circles and squares: [7,8], open circles and squares: [9,10]). The inset shows time-dependent solubility of blebbistatin in 0.1% DMSO that follows a single exponential function with a time constant of 50 min [9] (B) The absorbance spectrum of blebbistatin (black line) shows a characteristic peak at 420 nm. Circles and colored lines indicate excitation wavelengths and wide wavelength ranges, respectively, that were used to test blebbistatin’s photostability [8,11,21,33–35]. Color coding shows that blebbistatin undergoes signifi cant photodegradation at wavelengths around its absorbance peak, associated with cytotoxicity. However, longer wavelengths have no adverse effects on blebbistatin’s structure and toxicity. (C) The toxicity of blebbistatin depends on both the applied blebbistatin concentration and the incubation time in cell cultures (circles) or zebrafish embryos (diamonds) [8,9,33,34]. At short incubation times, cytotoxicity does not occur even at high blebbistatin concentrations. [Note that effective blebbistatin concentrations are uncertain above 50 mM and 1-h incubation, cf. (B).] Conversely, even low blebbistatin concentrations are highly cytotoxic at long (several days) incubation times. (D) Modifi cations of blebbistatin’s A or D-ring with small substituents (amine [9], nitro [8,13], allyloxy [11]) were found to improve blebbistatin’s adverse properties with retained or slightly reduced IC50 values (see also Figure 4). Notably, para-aminoblebbistatin showed a 46-fold increase in solubility over that of blebbistatin, with practically no fluorescence and cytotoxicity (even at long incubation times; small bars with arrows are shown only to indicate these fi ndings) [9]. Abbreviations: DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; IC50, half maximal inhibitory concentration; ND, not determined.

determination of effective drug concentrations [9,32]. Blebbistatin is highly hydrophobic and tends to accumulate in membranes or other lipophilic compartments such as zebrafish yolk [9]
or adipose tissue in mammals [32]. These issues result from the low water solubility of blebbistatin, reported to be between 4 and 25 mM in aqueous solutions containing 0.1–2% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) [7–10] (Figure 3A). Blebbistatin is often applied at high concen- trations (>30 mM), which is above its solubility limit in aqueous solutions. Although

blebbistatin’s solubility increases with DMSO concentration (Figure 3A), this is often counter- productive due to the cytotoxic effects of DMSO concentrations above 1%. Researchers therefore prefer to take advantage of blebbistatin’s relatively slow precipitation kinetics that transiently allows treatments with concentration over the solubility limit (Figure 3A inset). The method for dissolving blebbistatin needs to be optimized, too, to prevent immediate precipita- tion, because precipitates once formed are practically undissolvable [32]. Important aspects related to blebbistatin dissolution include the use of water-free DMSO, the prevention of precipitation upon incomplete mixing of solutions, and the use of prewarmed media [32].

Photodegradation and Phototoxicity
Blebbistatin’s photoinactivation, phototoxicity, and the instability of its stock solution concen- tration are the result of its photosensitivity that must be considered and addressed in experi- ments [33–35]. Studies on blebbistatin’s photosensitivity, using various light sources, irradiation times, and experimental readouts, are consistent with the photosensitivity correlating with blebbistatin’s absorbance spectrum, resulting in sensitivity to wavelengths below 500 nm (Figure 3B).

The precise mechanism of blebbistatin’s photodegradation and phototoxicity remains elusive. Photodegradation occurs in aqueous solutions [11] and, surprisingly, the end products them- selves have been demonstrated to be nontoxic to cells [33]. Instead, phototoxicity likely results from reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated during the degradation of blebbistatin [34] and/
or blebbistatin binding to proteins upon illumination [33]. The illumination-independent cyto- toxicity of blebbistatin (see the following discussion) suggests that degradation can also occur in the absence of light. Importantly, however, improved photostability is not necessarily accompanied by decreased phototoxicity [8]. Moreover, the cell type dependence of blebbis- tatin photosensitivity [34] suggests that, alongside variations in ROS sensitivity, blebbistatin degradation pathways may vary among cell lines.

Light-Independent Toxicity
Long-term incubation with blebbistatin often leads to toxic side effects even in the absence of irradiation. These myosin-independent effects have been observed in various human cancer cell lines, immortalized human fibroblasts, as well as in zebrafi sh embryos, with different levels of blebbistatin sensitivity in various systems [8,9,33,34]. Synthesis of published data reveals that incubation up to 1–2 days and 5–30-mM blebbistatin concentration can be generally tolerated at about 90% viability (Figure 3C). However, in short time-range experiments (incubation up to a few hours), even high concentrations of blebbistatin can be tolerated with no signs of toxicity.

Both precipitation and (photo)degradation decrease effective drug concentrations in blebbistatin solutions. It is therefore advisable to verify blebbistatin concentrations in stock solutions based on blebbistatin’s absorbance peak around 425 nm (Figure 3B). Extinction coefficients were reported to be 7400 Mti 1 cmti 1 at 422 nm [18] and 8300 Mti 1 cmti1 at 420 nm in DMSO (our unpublished measurements), and 6100 Mti 1 cmti1 at 427 nm in aqueous solution at pH 7.3 [8].

Fluorescence
Blebbistatin fl uoresces in organic and aqueous solvents, and precipitated blebbistatin crystals show even enhanced fluorescence compared with the dissolved molecule [10]. Excitation and emission spectra highly depend on solvent conditions, with excitation/emission peaks reported at 410/600 nm in methanol [13], 420/560 nm in DMSO, 340/410 nm in water (at pH 7), and 435/560 nm in 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) [32]. From a practical perspective, it is

important to note that, due to the overlap between the excitation spectra of blebbistatin, GFP, NADH, and various other fluorophores, the application of blebbistatin in cellular experiments should generally be avoided when these fl uorophores are used as reporter signals.

Structure–Activity Relationship of Blebbistatin Derivatives
The blebbistatin molecule comprises a tricyclic core (termed rings A–C) linked to a phenyl group (termed ring D) via the nitrogen heteroatom of the C-ring (Figure 4, Key Figure). As mentioned earlier, the configuration around the chiral carbon with a hydroxyl ligand determines the effectiveness of blebbistatin; thus, this part of the molecule appears to be crucial for function and hence it has not been modified. Mainly due to steric reasons, other parts of the B- and the C-rings have not been substituted. However, the effects of substitutions on the A- and D-rings have been extensively characterized (Figure 4) [7–14].

Addition of ring structures to the aromatic A-ring drastically reduced the inhibitory potential of blebbistatin, and nitro or smallalkylsubstitutions on theA-ring did notimprove inhibitory properties [12–14]. By contrast, D-ring modifications have been proven successful in ameliorating the adverse physicochemical and biological properties of blebbistatin, while its inhibitory features have largely been retained [7–11]. Large groups on the D-ring slightly decreased the inhibitory potential of blebbistatin (Figure 4A) [11]. However, small polar (e.g., hydroxyl, amino) substitutions on the D-ring significantly improved the water solubility and photostability of blebbistatin deriv- atives (Figure 4B–C) [9–11]. Blebbistatin’s fluorescence could also be reduced or eliminated by nitro or amino substitutions in para- (40 -) position on the D-ring (Figure 3D) [8,9]. Moreover, the most detrimental (photo)toxic properties of the original compound could also be partially or fully eliminated by the para-nitro and para-amino substitutions, respectively (Figure 3D) [8,9]. Accord- ingly, the chemical stability of these blebbistatin derivatives was significantly increased (Figure 4C) [8,9,11]. Because of these positive effects, the para-nitro and, especially, the para-amino substi- tuted versions of blebbistatin show greatly enhanced biosafety (Figure 3D). Hence, these deriv- atives can be used in long term and sensitive cell culture and in vivo experiments including functional assays elucidating the diverse cellular roles of NM2 isoforms, as well as the cytopro- tective and/or direct neuroregenerative effects of NM2 inhibition.

Potential for Pharmacological Development
Non-Muscle Myosin 2
Human NM2 isoforms negatively regulate neurite outgrowth at growth cones by pulling back the outgrowing actin bundles [36]. This mechanism also reduces the motile functions of non- neuronal cells by inhibiting the formation of protrusions and reducing cellular contractility, stress fi ber remodeling, focal adhesions, and tail retraction [37]. Thus, NM2 inhibition near lesion sites in spinal cord injuries or in the infarcted region after different types of stroke can lead to improved regenerative ability of the injured neuronal tissue [38]. Furthermore, NM2 inhibition by blebbistatin led to selective disruption of methamphetamine-associated memories in rats and mice [39–41]. NM2 inhibition has also been proposed to be beneficial in different types of fi brotic processes in the lung [42], liver [43], and joint capsule tissues [44], as well as in dermal wound healing [45–47] via reducing fibroblast motility and collagen production, thereby leading to reduced scar tissue formation. In addition, NM2 inhibition can be instrumental for novel forms of cancer chemotherapy by reducing cell migration of metastatic cancer cells [48–51].

Smooth Muscle Myosin 2
Different forms of smooth muscle myosin play important roles in tension maintenance of arteries and tracheae (SMM2A) and the contractility of the bladder, portal veins, and intestinal tissues

Key Figure
Effect of Blebbistatin Modifications on Inhibitory and Physicochemical Properties

(A)Inhibitory constant (IC50)

A-ring modifications

Increasing IC
50

Br
H
Essential
CH3 chiral -OH
O O H
A B C
N
N

D-ring modifications in meta-position
O
O
CH
3 NH

CH
2

H N

N

H N
O

N
O
H C
3

CH3

D
NH O
2
OH
O Increasing IC
50

CH
2
O

OH

O
NH
2
O

NH
CH
3

CH
2

H C
2

O

N

O
O

CH
3

C l
N
O

O

CH
2
N

CH
2

OH
NH2
N
N

N
O

CH
2

Increasing

N H

N H

IC

D-ring modifications in para-position
50
D-ring modifications with additional rings

O

(B)Solubility (C) Stability

A-ring D-ring A-ring D-ring

H 3 C
O

O H
meta-position
O

H 3 C
O

O H
meta- position

Decreased sol.

H N H N

N

H C
2

D-ring
A B C
N
N

NH
2
OH

D

Increased

sol.
O H
O H
N H O
2
N H
2
O
decreased

N O N N
N
O

C H 2
Increased stab.

O

N
O
A B C
N
N

NH 2 O H C l
N
O
N
O N
O
C H
2
D-ring

D

N

Increased
stab.
C H
2
O
OH
N H
2

para-position
para-position

(See figure legend on the bottom of the next page.)

(SMM2B) [1]. Thus, the selective inhibition of these myosin forms could lead to vasodilatation that may be highly useful in the treatment of high blood pressure [52], pulmonary (arterial) hypertension, thrombotic disorders [53], and could help in overcoming erectile dysfunctions, too [54]. SMM2 inhibition has also been implicated in the treatment of overactive bladder and the maintenance of bladder compliance [50,55].

Recent pharmacological efforts to alleviate hypertension have focused on the inhibition of Rho- associated protein kinase (ROCK), an upstream regulator of SMM2 and NM2 isoforms, by fasudil [56]; and on the application of the phosphodiesterase inhibitor sildenafi l (Viagra) [57]. However, the inhibition of these upstream factors infl uences a broad range of cellular pro- cesses. Because of the large number of its downstream effectors, ROCK inhibition affects cell cycle control, cell proliferation, cell motility, glucose uptake, and cytoskeletal remodeling processes, leading to a broad spectrum of side effects [58]. Importantly, these adverse effects could be circumvented by the development of biologically safe blebbistatin derivatives directly influencing the terminal effector myosin 2 isoforms instead of the upstream effectors.

Skeletal and Cardiac Muscle Myosin 2
Skeletal and cardiac muscles contain different types of muscle fi bers of varying myosin 2 heavy- chain composition [59]. Mutations or dysfunction of these myosin isoforms can lead to different types of myopathy affecting the voluntary and heart muscles [60]. Skeletal or cardiac muscle activation through myosin (e.g., by omecamtiv mecarbil) or other protein components can be an efficient means to treat myopathies as these conditions often arise from the reduced force- producing efficiency of the relevant muscles [61,62] (Table 1). In the following section, we focus on medical indications in which the inhibition of the actomyosin system, by blocking myosin in the actin-detached (nonforce-producing) state (Box 1), could lead to temporary or permanent release of spasms and concomitant pain.

Spasms are involuntary contractions of skeletal muscles that can arise from medical treatment, genetic diseases, or psychological disorders. Skeletal muscle spasm is a characteristic symptom of nonspecific low back pain affecting the general well-being of millions of people worldwide [63]. Other modern human medical conditions that are becoming more common include spinal disk hernia and lumbago, both characterized by severe and long lasting spasm of the back muscles [64]. Spasticity is also an accompanying condition of genetic diseases such as sclerosis multiplex [65] and epilepsia partialis continua [66,67]. In addition to these diseases, the most serious symptom of some conditions of psychological origin, such as vaginismus, is the involuntary contraction of genital skeletal muscles leading to sexual discomfort and pain, diffi culty in gynecological examinations, and inability to have intercourse [68]. Various medi- cations cause skeletal muscle spasms as severe side effects, too. Thus, inhibition of myosins in the relevant striated muscles in the actin-detached form could lead to the relaxation of these muscles and relief from the accompanying pain. Blebbistatin and its derivatives can therefore become promising candidates for the treatment of such conditions, further underscoring the need for the development of specific and medically safe blebbistatin derivatives.

Figure 4. Schematic representation of the inhibitory (A), solubility (B), and stability (C) properties shows how the applied blebbistatin modifications improve (green) or worsen (red) these features [7–14]. The R(+)-enantiomer of blebbistatin (and that of its derivatives) is inactive, indicating that the chiral hydroxyl group is crucial for activity [10,18]. Considering all three important parameters shown, A-ring modifi cations have generally deteriorated blebbistatin’s properties [12–14]. D-ring modifi cations in the meta-position have generally led to reduced inhibitory properties [10,11]. However, D-ring modifi cations in the para-position have led to signifi cant improvements in important aspects [7–9,11]. Para-aminoblebbistatin, for instance, has practically retained blebbistatin’s inhibitory effect, with greatly improved solubility and photostability and no cytotoxic effects (cf. Figure 3D) [9].

Besides myosin inhibition, skeletal muscle relaxation can be achieved by targeting the neuro- muscular junction using small-molecule drugs (e.g., baclofen, tizanidine, dantrolene, and benzodiazepines). However, these treatments can have severe side effects as they aspecifically affect neuronal processes in all muscle types and influence aspecific brain functions, too. Botulinum toxin (BTX), a highly potent toxin that prevents neurotransmitter release in neuro- muscular junctions, has been widely used to relax muscle spasms in medical, research, and cosmetic applications. However, BTX treatment is associated with severe side effects including unintended paralysis of nontarget muscles, general muscle weakness, problems with swallow- ing, headache and – due to its protein nature – allergic reactions [69]. Thus, direct and isoform- specific inhibition of sarcomeric myosin 2 isoforms by blebbistatin derivatives holds promises for reducing side effects and enhancing effect profiles of novel drug candidates.

Concluding Remarks and Future Perspectives
Development of blebbistatin derivatives that retain or enhance blebbistatin’s highly potent and myosin 2-specifi c inhibitory properties, while reducing its adverse physicochemical and toxic features, is of urgent need. Novel, biologically safe, potent, and possibly myosin isoform- specific derivatives could be used to effectively treat a wide range of medical conditions affecting the quality of life of millions of people worldwide (Table 1). Moreover, the direct inhibition of myosin 2 isoforms instead of that of their upstream regulators (e.g., ROCK) could significantly reduce the side effect profile of future drug candidates in various medical indica- tions. To explore the possibilities for isoform-specific inhibitors, effect profiles of blebbistatin derivatives must be assessed for a broad range of skeletal, cardiac, smooth muscle, and non- muscle myosin 2 isoforms. Individual or combined modifi cations of blebbistatin’s A- and D- rings and, possibly, that of the C-ring, may lead to more effective and/or selective candidates for drug development (see Outstanding Questions).

Acknowledgments
This work was funded by Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Offi ce Grant NVKP 16-1-2016-0051 to A.M-C.

Disclaimer Statement
A.M-C. is an employee of Printnet Ltd., owner of a patent on para-aminoblebbistatin and its derivatives (PCT/EP2017/
051829). A.M-C. is an owner, A.Á.R. is an employee of Optopharma Ltd., an enterprise distributing blebbistatin derivatives.

Supplemental Information
Supplemental information associated with this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2018.06.006.

References
1.Sellers, J.R. (1999) Myosins. (2nd edn), Oxford University Press 7. Képiró, M. et al. (2012) Azidoblebbistatin, a photoreactive myosin
2.Allingham, J.S. et al. (2005) The structural basis of blebbistatin inhibitor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 9402–9407
inhibition and specifi city for myosin II. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 8. Képiró, M. et al. (2014) para-Nitroblebbistatin, the non-cytotoxic
378–379 and photostable myosin II inhibitor. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
3.Fedorov, R. et al. (2009) The mechanism of pentabromopseudilin 53, 8211–8215
inhibition of myosin motor activity. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 80– 9. Várkuti, B.H. et al. (2016) A highly soluble, non-phototoxic, non-
88 fl uorescent blebbistatin derivative. Sci. Rep. 6, 26141
4.Preller, M. et al. (2011) Inhibition of myosin ATPase activity by 10. Verhasselt, S. et al. (2017) Discovery of (S)-30 -hydroxyblebbistatin
halogenated pseudilins: a structure-activity study. J. Med. Chem. and (S)-30 -aminoblebbistatin: polar myosin II inhibitors with supe-
54, 3675–3685 rior research tool properties. Org. Biomol. Chem. 15, 2104–2118
5.Winkelmann, D.A. et al. (2015) Structural basis for drug-induced 11. Verhasselt, S. et al. (2017) Improved synthesis and comparative
allosteric changes to human b-cardiac myosin motor activity. Nat. analysis of the tool properties of new and existing D-ring modifi ed
Commun. 6, 7974 (S)-blebbistatin analogs. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 136, 85–103
6.Sirigu, S. et al. (2016) Highly selective inhibition of myosin motors 12. Verhasselt, S. et al. (2017) Insights into the myosin II inhibitory
provides the basis of potential therapeutic application. Proc. Natl. potency of A-ring-modifi ed (S)-blebbistatin analogs. Bioorg. Med.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113, E7448–E7455 Chem. Lett. 27, 2986–2989

Outstanding Questions
Can blebbistatin’s physicochemical properties, inhibitory activity, and bio- safety be further improved by A-, D-, and potentially, C-ring modifications, or combinations thereof?

What are the prospects for the devel- opment of a myosin 2 isoform-specific blebbistatin derivative in selectively and effi ciently treating various myosin 2-related diseases?

Can the direct inhibition of myosin 2 be used to circumvent the side effects of inhibitors of upstream processes?

13.Lucas-Lopez, C. et al. (2005) Absolute stereochemical assign- ment and fl uorescence tuning of the small molecule tool, (–)-blebbistatin. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 1736–1740
14.Lucas-Lopez, C. et al. (2008) The small molecule tool (S)-(-)-bleb- bistatin: novel insights of relevance to myosin inhibitor design. Org. Biomol. Chem. 6, 2076–2084
15.Soykan, T. et al. (2017) Synaptic vesicle endocytosis occurs on multiple timescales and is mediated by formin-dependent actin assembly. Neuron 93, 854–866.e4
16.Chabaud, M. et al. (2015) Cell migration and antigen capture are antagonistic processes coupled by myosin II in dendritic cells. Nat. Commun. 6, 7526
17.Kocgozlu, L. et al. (2016) Epithelial cell packing induces distinct modes of cell extrusions. Curr. Biol. 26, 2942–2950
18.Straight, A. et al. (2003) Dissecting temporal and spatial control of cytokinesis with a myosin II inhibitor. Science 299, 1743–1747
19.Málnási-Csizmadia, A. and Kovács, M. (2010) Emerging complex pathways of the actomyosin powerstroke. Trends Biochem. Sci. 35, 684–690
20.Kovács, M. et al. (2004) Mechanism of blebbistatin inhibition of myosin II. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 35557–35563
21.Ramamurthy, B. et al. (2004) Kinetic mechanism of blebbistatin inhibition of nonmuscle myosin IIB. Biochemistry 43, 14832–14839
22.Limouze, J. et al. (2004) Specifi city of blebbistatin, an inhibitor of myosin II. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 25, 337–341
23.Zhang, H.M. et al. (2017) Characterization of blebbistatin inhibi- tion of smooth muscle myosin and nonmuscle myosin-2. Biochemistry 56, 4235–4243
24.Dou, Y. et al. (2007) Blebbistatin specifi cally inhibits actin-myosin interaction in mouse cardiac muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 293, C1148–C1153
25.Farman, G.P. et al. (2008) Blebbistatin: use as inhibitor of muscle contraction. Pfl ugers Arch. 455, 995–1005
26.Kampourakis, T. et al. (2018) Omecamtiv mercabil and blebbis- tatin modulate cardiac contractility by perturbing the regulatory state of the myosin fi lament. J. Physiol. 596, 31–46
27.Wang, H.H. et al. (2008) Blebbistatin inhibits the chemotaxis of vascular smooth muscle cells by disrupting the myosin II-actin interaction. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 294, H2060–H2068
28.Eddinger, T.J. et al. (2007) Potent inhibition of arterial smooth muscle tonic contractions by the selective myosin II inhibitor, blebbistatin. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 320, 865–870
29.Heissler, S.M. et al. (2015) Kinetic characterization of the sole nonmuscle myosin-2 from the model organism Drosophila melanogaster. FASEB J. 29, 1456–1466
30.Heissler, S. and Manstein, D. (2013) Nonmuscle myosin-2: mix and match. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 70, 1–21
31.Bloemink, M. and Geeves, M. (2011) Shaking the myosin family tree: biochemical kinetics defi nes four types of myosin motor. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 961–967
32.Swift, L.M. et al. (2012) Properties of blebbistatin for cardiac optical mapping and other imaging applications. Pfl ugers Arch. 464, 503–512
33.Kolega, J. (2004) Phototoxicity and photoinactivation of blebbis- tatin in UV and visible light. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 320, 1020–1025
34.Mikulich, A. et al. (2012) Blebbistatin, a myosin inhibitor, is phototoxic to human cancer cells under exposure to blue light. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1820, 870–877
35.Sakamoto, T. et al. (2005) Blebbistatin, a myosin II inhibitor, is photoinactivated by blue light. Biochemistry 44, 584–588
36.Medeiros, N.A. et al. (2006) Myosin II functions in actin-bundle turnover in neuronal growth cones. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 215–226
37.Even-Ram, S. et al. (2007) Myosin IIA regulates cell motility and actomyosin-microtubule crosstalk. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 299–309
38.Kubo, T. et al. (2008) The therapeutic effects of Rho-ROCK inhibitors on CNS disorders. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 4, 605–615

39.Young, E.J. et al. (2016) Nonmuscle myosin IIB as a therapeutic target for the prevention of relapse to methamphetamine use. Mol. Psychiatry 21, 615–623
40.Young, E.J. et al. (2017) Nonmuscle myosin II inhibition disrupts methamphetamine-associated memory in females and adoles- cents. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 139, 109–116
41.Mohamed, R.M.P. et al. (2017) Try to remember: interplay between memory and substance use disorder. Curr. Drug Targets Published online June 21, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/
10.2174/1389450118666170622092824
42.Southern, B.D. et al. (2016) Matrix-driven myosin II mediates the pro-fi brotic fi broblast phenotype. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 6083–6095
43.Liu, Z. et al. (2010) Blebbistatin inhibits contraction and accel- erates migration in mouse hepatic stellate cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 159, 304–315
44.Atluri, K. et al. (2016) Blebbistatin-loaded poly(D,L-lactide-co-gly- colide) particles for treating arthrofi brosis. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2, 1097–1107
45.Bond, J.E. et al. (2011) Angiotensin-II mediates nonmuscle myosin II activation and expression and contributes to human keloid disease progression. Mol. Med. 17, 1196–1203
46.Bond, J.E. et al. (2011) Temporal spatial expression and function of non-muscle myosin II isoforms IIA and IIB in scar remodeling. Lab. Invest. 91, 499–508
47.Arora, P.D. et al. (2015) Flightless I interacts with NMMIIA to promote cell extension formation, which enables collagen remod- eling. Mol. Biol. Cell 26, 2279–2297
48.Doller, A. et al. (2015) The cytoskeletal inhibitors latrunculin A and blebbistatin exert antitumorigenic properties in human hepato- cellular carcinoma cells by interfering with intracellular HuR traf- fi cking. Exp. Cell Res. 330, 66–80
49.Tomii, S. et al. (2017) Cortical actin alteration at the matrix-side cytoplasm in lung adenocarcinoma cells and its significance in invasion. Pathobiology 84, 171–183
50.Chen, P. et al. (2018) The expression and functional activities of smooth muscle myosin and non-muscle myosin isoforms in rat prostate. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 22, 576–588
51.Wigton, E.J. et al. (2016) Myosin-IIA regulates leukemia engraft- ment and brain infi ltration in a mouse model of acute lympho- blastic leukemia. J. Leukoc. Biol. 100, 143–153
52.Michael, S.K. et al. (2008) High blood pressure arising from a defect in vascular function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 6702–6707
53.Zhai, K. et al. (2015) NMMHC IIA inhibition impedes tissue factor expression and venous thrombosis via Akt/GSK3beta-NF-kap- paB signalling pathways in the endothelium. Thromb. Haemost. 114, 173–185
54.Zhang, X.H. et al. (2009) In vitro and in vivo relaxation of corpus cavernosum smooth muscle by the selective myosin II inhibitor, blebbistatin. J. Sex. Med. 6, 2661–2671
55.Neal, C.J. et al. (2017) Slowly cycling Rho kinase-dependent actomyosin cross-bridge “slippage” explains intrinsic high com- pliance of detrusor smooth muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 313, F126–F134
56.Xiao, J.W. et al. (2015) Acute effects of Rho-kinase inhibitor fasudil on pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with con- genital heart defects. Circ. J. 79, 1342–1348
57.Webb, D.J. et al. (1999) Sildenafi l citrate and blood-pressure- lowering drugs: results of drug interaction studies with an organic nitrate and a calcium antagonist. Am. J. Cardiol. 83, 21C–28C
58.Amin, E. et al. (2013) Rho-kinase: regulation, (dys)function, and inhibition. Biol. Chem. 394, 1399–1410
59.Tajsharghi, H. and Oldfors, A. (2013) Myosinopathies: pathology and mechanisms. Acta Neuropathol. 125, 3–18
60.Ochala, J. and Sun, Y.B. (2016) Novel myosin-based therapies for congenital cardiac and skeletal myopathies. J. Med. Genet. 53, 651–654

61.Malik, F.I. et al. (2011) Cardiac myosin activation: a potential therapeutic approach for systolic heart failure. Science 331, 1439–1443
62.Hwang, P.M. and Sykes, B.D. (2015) Targeting the sarcomere to correct muscle function. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 14, 313–328
63.Maher, C. et al. (2017) Non-specific low back pain. Lancet 389, 736–747
64.Hirayama, J. et al. (2006) Relationship between low-back pain, muscle spasm and pressure pain thresholds in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Eur. Spine J. 15, 41–47
65.Foley, P.L. et al. (2013) Prevalence and natural history of pain in adults with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analy- sis. Pain 154, 632–642
66.Mameniškien _e, R. and Wolf, P. (2017) Epilepsia partialis continua: a review. Seizure 44, 74–80
67.Espay, A.J. et al. (2008) Chronic isolated hemifacial spasm as a manifestation of epilepsia partialis continua. Epilepsy Behav. 12, 332–336
68.Pacik, P.T. (2014) Understanding and treating vaginismus: a multimodal approach. Int. Urogynecol. J. 25, 1613–1620
69.Cote, T.R. et al. (2005) Botulinum toxin type A injections: adverse events reported to the US Food and Drug Administration in therapeutic and cosmetic cases. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 53, 407–415
70.Chang, Y. et al. (2007) Proplatelet formation is regulated by the Rho/ROCK pathway. Blood 109, 4229–4236
71.Feghhi, S. et al. (2016) Nonmuscle myosin IIA regulates platelet contractile forces through rho kinase and myosin light-chain kinase. J. Biomech. Eng. 138, 1045061–1045064

72.Zhang, Y. et al. (2017) The myosin ii inhibitor, blebbistatin, ameli- orates FeCl3-induced arterial thrombosis via the GSK3beta-NF- kappaB pathway. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 13, 630–639
73.Wang, Y. et al. (2017) Myosin IIA-related actomyosin contractility mediates oxidative stress-induced neuronal apoptosis. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 10, 75
74.Su, Z. et al. (2016) Oxidized low-density lipoprotein-induced cyclophilin A secretion requires ROCK-dependent diphosphor- ylation of myosin light chain. J. Vasc. Res. 53, 206–215
75.Yoshimoto, T. et al. (2016) Aggregatibacter actinomycetemco- mitans outer membrane protein 29 (Omp29) induces TGF-beta- regulated apoptosis signal in human gingival epithelial cells via fi bronectin/integrinbeta1/FAK cascade. Cell. Microbiol. 18, 1723–1738
76.Jiang, L. et al. (2016) Substrate stiffness of endothelial cells directs LFA-1/ICAM-1 interaction: a physical trigger of immune-related diseases? Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 61, 633–643
77.Cymerys, J. et al. (2016) Function of myosin during entry and egress of equid herpesvirus type 1 in primary murine neurons. Acta Virol. 60, 410–416
78.Zhang, X. et al. (2011) In vitro and in vivo relaxation of urinary bladder smooth muscle by the selective myosin II inhibitor, bleb- bistatin. BJU Int. 107, 310–317
79.Ujfalusi, Z. et al. (2018) Dilated cardiomyopathy myosin mutants have reduced force-generating capacity. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 9017–9029